Contractors must bid projects based on all the contract documents. If the contract documents (i.e., permits) do not state something is approved, the contractor can pursue a request to the regulatory agency for their own additional approvals (refer to Iowa Department of Transportation's General Specifications 1107.18 Environmental Protection).
Any permit approvals obtained by the contractor postletting, after award of contract and signing, would not be subject to value engineering, as long as it does not involve a change to the plans. The postletting permit approvals must be confirmed in writing from the regulatory agency and will be accepted by the Iowa Department of Transportation.
It is not possible for the Iowa DOT to submit all the potential methods for permit approval because this is dependent on the contractor's means and methods. The Iowa DOT will ensure that there is at least one method that can be used to ensure the work is constructible.
Temporary stream access is detailed in Standard Road Plan EW-401.
The term ordinary high-water mark means a point on a streambank or shoreline at which the presence and action of surface water is so continuous as to leave a distinct mark below which vegetation and soil is noticeably different from the top of the streambank or shoreline. This mark is typically recognized by the presence of a clear line below which vegetation cannot grow due to the presence of surface water, but can also be identified by other physical characteristics within the stream channel, including the presence of litter and woody debris (e.g., corn stubble, leaves, tree branches and/or limbs), or erosional features, such as shelving, scour holes, and sediment.
Sandbars and vegetation bars within the stream channel are generally considered to be below the ordinary high-water mark.
Not at this time, but this will be further reviewed for consideration in the future.
Not at this time, but this will be further reviewed for consideration in the future.
For some projects the Iowa Department of Transportation will hold possible constructability meetings and/or pre-bid meetings
for discussion of the project and to received input from the construction industry.
If Iowa Department of Transportation determines that dredging is essential to construct the project, then the Iowa DOT will pursue
approval of dredging in the 404 permit application. This typically includes dredging inside
cofferdams, barge slips, removal of sand bars to improve water flow, etc.
If the Iowa DOT determines that dredging in the project area is not allowed, due to environmental or other
concerns, then the Iowa DOT will include a Standard Note 282-2 in the plans clearly stating that dredging of any
type is not allowed and the reason why.
When not specifically disallowed by the Iowa DOT, contractors may elect to pursue their own approvals for the
use of dredged materials, provided those approvals are in accordance with Articles 1107.18 and 1106.07
and there are no environmental concerns. Elective items typically include the use of dredged materials
for causeways constructed according to Standard Road Plan EW-401, work pads, etc. The Iowa DOT will inform contractors of
relevant information about stream conditions as much as possible based on specific questions provided
via BIDX. Please note that Iowa DOT obtains approval for temporary structures constructed according to Standard Road Plan
EW-401, but not for the source of materials used within those structures.
In general, 404 permits require that materials excavated/dredged from the stream be removed to
upland, non-wetland locations when no longer necessary for construction of the project.
The initial step in addressing archeological concerns is to ensure completion of an Iowa Site (I-Sites) File Search for the borrow site. Information regarding the I-Sites archeology database is available via The Office of the State Archeologist webpage, https://archaeology.uiowa.edu/, or by calling (319) 384-0735.
If an archaeological site is identified via the I-Sites file search and must be avoided, take measures to fence off the area prior to mobilization and ground disturbance. Fencing is typically used for site avoidance, and it is recommended that an archaeologist guides the fencing of the restricted area. If a survey is recommended, proceed with completion of a survey. If the I-Sites file search results in no recommended action, then the minimum effort for site review has is complete.
If the recommendations for a site or a survey are unclear, it is recommended to contact the state archaeologist or the Corps of Engineers.
Please forward the I-Site file search to the Corps of Engineers.
The vast majority of regulated materials reviews can be satisfied with a desktop search of on-line regulatory databases, historic aerial photos, Google Earth, and county assessor web pages. This is meant to roughly follow the requirements of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) as outlined in ASTM Standard E1527. If needed, an environmental consulting firm can be hired to perform a Phase I ESA.
A listing of sites where contamination has the potential to be present would be extensive and likely could never be considered all-inclusive. However, the most commonly contaminated sites are gas stations/convenience stores, dry cleaners, junkyards, landfills, bulk petroleum storage facilities, railyards, former manufactured gas plants, etc. The majority of potentially contaminated sites would involve previously or currently developed commercial or industrial parcels. It is highly unlikely crop, pasture or otherwise vacant land with no prior history of commercial or industrial usage would have contamination issues (but still need to be reviewed as confirmation).
Sites that are known to be contaminated should be avoided if at all possible. If avoidance is not an option, on-site testing of soil and groundwater will be necessary to determine the limits of the contamination plume(s) so the area(s) of contaminated material can be avoided. These types of investigations have the potential to become very costly.
Sites that could potentially be contaminated based on the desktop review will need confirmation sampling of the soil and groundwater. This typically involves a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed in accordance with ASTM Standard E1903. An environmental professional would be needed to perform a Phase II ESA.
Testing requirements will vary depending upon the present and prior site usage and potential contamination sources. An environmental professional would need to develop a sampling plan identifying sampling locations and appropriate analytical testing.