Results
The analysis helps identify roads where there is a greater risk of flood events and helps us determine where additional work could make the roads stronger related to flooding. The overall distribution of composite ratings ranged from 36.6 to 93.4, with an average of 82.4. Roads of most concern from a long-range planning standpoint, are those roads that had a composite score one or more standard deviations below the statewide average. There are 72 such roads which have a composite score of 75.1 or less.